discourse: not having trans headcanons because you’re cis and because you don’t feel like thats your story to tell/you don’t want to misrepresent or fetishize them is not the same as being transphobic and i would like this entire website to stop thinking so
- Tagged
- actually being respectful
- discourse
- headcanons isn't activism and you're not -phobic if you don't have any (x minority) headcanon of your own
- i don't even feel like i need to justify this anyway because some people just don't feel the need to make these kinda headcanons
- it's like straight ppl being like ''well i dont know what being gay is like so i'm not going to make gay headcanons''
- it's? understandable imo? and i think that as long as they don't tell others that their headcanons are invalid they're
- like as a girl that likes girls if a straight person thinks (x) character is straight but respects that i think they're bi or whatever then
- literally just respectign that another person may headcanon that same character as x minority even if you yourself may not is
- proof that you're not x-phobic or atleast a staple in that proof
- rambling
- they're fictional characters harold!
- yo ur cool man.. you do you.... headcanons isn't activism.
Published